All customers
SkilltheoryTalent intelligence

Skilltheory took on four times the roles without adding a recruiter

A twelve-person agency competing against firms five times its size. The constraint was never talent or client demand, it was how many reqs one person could hold in their head at once.

4.1xRoles handled per recruiter
63%Less time from brief to shortlist
12Recruiters, unchanged

The problem

Skilltheory competes against firms five times its size and wins on one thing: how well it understands a brief. Twelve recruiters who genuinely know the markets they work in will beat a large generalist bench most days of the week.

What they could not win on was throughput. An agency is paid per placement, so capacity is revenue, and capacity was capped by something unglamorous: how many open briefs one person can hold in their head at once before the quality of their reading degrades.

The ceiling was roughly four. Beyond that, the fifth brief got the attention left over from the first four, and the client noticed.

Where the ceiling actually was

Not in sourcing. Finding people was the part the team was good at and the part they enjoyed. The ceiling was in the middle: the two or three hours per brief spent reading a longlist down to a shortlist, which had to happen for every brief, every week, and which could not be batched or deferred without the whole thing collapsing.

What changed

The longlist-to-shortlist pass moved. Criteria are written at intake, while the client conversation is still fresh, which turned out to have a second benefit nobody planned for: writing testable criteria during a brief exposes the vague parts of the brief while the client is still on the call.

4.1xRoles handled per recruiter
63%Less time from brief to shortlist
12Recruiters, unchanged

The shortlist that arrives is not the shortlist that goes to the client. It is a starting point that a recruiter reads, argues with, and roughly a third of the time rearranges. That last part is the job, and it is the part that got its time back.

The bit that surprised them

Client conversations changed character. A shortlist that arrives with a written reason per candidate invites a different discussion than one that arrives as six names.

Clients push back on criteria now rather than on people, which is a far more productive argument to have. When a client says the third requirement is too strict, that is thirty seconds of editing and a re-run, instead of a fortnight of sending profiles that keep missing for a reason nobody has articulated.

Keep reading

More customer stories

The future of recruiting is here.

Source
Screen
Sequence
Interview
Recruiters using Arbi on a laptop